NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics
Solution:
Given:
- Charge \( q_1 = 2 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{C} \)
- Charge \( q_2 = 3 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{C} \)
- Distance \( r = 30 \, \text{cm} = 0.3 \, \text{m} \)
- Coulomb’s constant \( k = 9 \times 10^9 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \)
Using Coulomb’s law, the force \( F \) is given by:
\[ F = \frac{k \cdot q_1 \cdot q_2}{r^2} \]
Substituting the values:
\[ F = \frac{9 \times 10^9 \cdot (2 \times 10^{-7}) \cdot (3 \times 10^{-7})}{(0.3)^2} \]
\[ F = \frac{9 \times 10^9 \cdot 6 \times 10^{-14}}{0.09} \]
\[ F = \frac{54 \times 10^{-5}}{0.09} = 6 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{N} \]
Thus, the force between the charges is \( 6 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{N} \), and it is repulsive since both charges are positive.
Solution:
Given:
- Charge \( q_1 = 0.4 \, \mu\text{C} = 0.4 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Charge \( q_2 = -0.8 \, \mu\text{C} = -0.8 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Force \( F = 0.2 \, \text{N} \)
- Coulomb’s constant \( k = 9 \times 10^9 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \)
(a) Distance between the two spheres:
Using Coulomb’s law:
\[ F = \frac{k \cdot |q_1 \cdot q_2|}{r^2} \]
Rearranging for \( r \):
\[ r^2 = \frac{k \cdot |q_1 \cdot q_2|}{F} \]
\[ r = \sqrt{\frac{9 \times 10^9 \cdot (0.4 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot (0.8 \times 10^{-6})}{0.2}} \]
\[ r = \sqrt{\frac{9 \times 10^9 \cdot 0.32 \times 10^{-12}}{0.2}} \]
\[ r = \sqrt{\frac{2.88 \times 10^{-3}}{0.2}} = \sqrt{0.0144} \approx 0.12 \, \text{m} \]
Thus, the distance is \( 0.12 \, \text{m} \) or \( 12 \, \text{cm} \).
(b) Force on the second sphere:
By Newton’s third law, the force on the second sphere due to the first is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Thus, the force is \( 0.2 \, \text{N} \), attractive (since the charges are opposite).
Solution:
(a) Checking if the ratio is dimensionless:
Let’s find the units of the given ratio \( \frac{k e^2}{G m_e m_p} \).
- Coulomb’s constant \( k = 9 \times 10^9 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \), so units are \( \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \).
- Charge of electron \( e \), units: \( \text{C} \), so \( e^2 = \text{C}^2 \).
- Gravitational constant \( G = 6.674 \times 10^{-11} \, \text{m}^3 \text{kg}^{-1} \text{s}^{-2} \).
- Mass of electron \( m_e \), units: \( \text{kg} \).
- Mass of proton \( m_p \), units: \( \text{kg} \), so \( m_e m_p = \text{kg}^2 \).
Numerator: \( k e^2 = \left( \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \right) \cdot \text{C}^2 = \text{N·m}^2 \).
Denominator: \( G m_e m_p = \left( \text{m}^3 \text{kg}^{-1} \text{s}^{-2} \right) \cdot \text{kg}^2 = \text{m}^3 \text{kg} \text{s}^{-2} \).
Since \( \text{N} = \text{kg·m/s}^2 \), numerator becomes:
\[ \text{N·m}^2 = \left( \text{kg·m/s}^2 \right) \cdot \text{m}^2 = \text{kg·m}^3/\text{s}^2 \].
Ratio: \( \frac{k e^2}{G m_e m_p} = \frac{\text{kg·m}^3/\text{s}^2}{\text{m}^3 \text{kg} \text{s}^{-2}} = \text{dimensionless} \).
Thus, the ratio is dimensionless.
(b) Numerical calculation:
Values:
- \( k = 9 \times 10^9 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C}^2 \)
- \( e = 1.602 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C} \), so \( e^2 = (1.602 \times 10^{-19})^2 = 2.566 \times 10^{-38} \, \text{C}^2 \)
- \( G = 6.674 \times 10^{-11} \, \text{m}^3 \text{kg}^{-1} \text{s}^{-2} \)
- \( m_e = 9.109 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg} \)
- \( m_p = 1.673 \times 10^{-27} \, \text{kg} \), so \( m_e m_p = 9.109 \times 10^{-31} \cdot 1.673 \times 10^{-27} \approx 1.523 \times 10^{-57} \, \text{kg}^2 \)
Numerator: \( k e^2 = 9 \times 10^9 \cdot 2.566 \times 10^{-38} \approx 2.309 \times 10^{-28} \, \text{N·m}^2 \).
Denominator: \( G m_e m_p = 6.674 \times 10^{-11} \cdot 1.523 \times 10^{-57} \approx 1.016 \times 10^{-67} \, \text{m}^3 \text{kg} \text{s}^{-2} \).
Ratio: \( \frac{2.309 \times 10^{-28}}{1.016 \times 10^{-67}} \approx 2.27 \times 10^{39} \).
Thus, the numerical value of the ratio is approximately \( 2.27 \times 10^{39} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charge \( q = 2.0 \, \mu\text{C} = 2.0 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
Using Gauss’s law, the net electric flux \( \Phi \) through a closed surface is:
\[ \Phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \]
Substituting the values:
\[ \Phi = \frac{2.0 \times 10^{-6}}{8.854 \times 10^{-12}} \approx 2.26 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Thus, the net electric flux through the surface is \( 2.26 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charge \( q_1 = +2.0 \, \mu\text{C} = 2.0 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Charge \( q_2 = -2.0 \, \mu\text{C} = -2.0 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
Using Gauss’s law, the net electric flux \( \Phi \) through a closed surface is given by the total enclosed charge:
\[ \Phi = \frac{q_{\text{total}}}{\epsilon_0} \]
Total charge: \( q_{\text{total}} = q_1 + q_2 = 2.0 \times 10^{-6} + (-2.0 \times 10^{-6}) = 0 \, \text{C} \).
\[ \Phi = \frac{0}{\epsilon_0} = 0 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Thus, the net electric flux through the surface is \( 0 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Electric flux \( \Phi = -750 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
(a) Flux through a doubled radius:
By Gauss’s law, the electric flux through a closed surface depends only on the enclosed charge and not on the size of the surface. Thus, if the radius is doubled, the flux remains the same:
\[ \Phi = -750 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \].
(b) Value of the point charge:
Using Gauss’s law: \( \Phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \).
\[ q = \Phi \cdot \epsilon_0 = -750 \cdot 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \approx -6.641 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{C} \]
Thus, the point charge is \( -6.641 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{C} \) or \( -6.641 \, \mu\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Electric flux \( \Phi = -500 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
Using Gauss’s law: \( \Phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \).
\[ q = \Phi \cdot \epsilon_0 = -500 \cdot 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \approx -4.427 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{C} \]
Thus, the charge on the particle is \( -4.427 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{C} \) or \( -4.427 \, \mu\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Electric field \( E = 9 \times 10^4 \, \text{N/C} \)
- Distance \( r = 2 \, \text{cm} = 0.02 \, \text{m} \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
For an infinite line charge, the electric field is given by:
\[ E = \frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 r} \]
Rearranging for linear charge density \( \lambda \):
\[ \lambda = E \cdot 2 \pi \epsilon_0 r \]
Substituting the values:
\[ \lambda = (9 \times 10^4) \cdot 2 \cdot 3.1416 \cdot (8.854 \times 10^{-12}) \cdot 0.02 \]
\[ \lambda = (9 \times 10^4) \cdot 6.2832 \cdot 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \cdot 0.02 \]
\[ \lambda = (9 \times 10^4) \cdot 1.112 \times 10^{-12} \approx 1.0 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{C/m} \]
Thus, the linear charge density is \( 1.0 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{C/m} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Surface charge density \( \sigma = 17.0 \times 10^{-22} \, \text{C/m}^2 \)
- Permittivity of free space \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
For two parallel plates with equal and opposite surface charge density, the electric field is:
(a) In the outer region of the first plate:
The electric fields due to both plates cancel out in the outer regions (outside both plates) because the fields from opposite charges are in opposite directions and of equal magnitude.
\[ E = 0 \, \text{N/C} \]
(b) In the outer region of the second plate:
Similarly, the electric fields cancel out outside the second plate.
\[ E = 0 \, \text{N/C} \]
(c) Between the plates:
The electric fields due to both plates add up between the plates. The field due to a single plate is \( \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \), and for two plates with opposite charges, the total field is:
\[ E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \]
Substituting the values:
\[ E = \frac{17.0 \times 10^{-22}}{8.854 \times 10^{-12}} \approx 1.92 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{N/C} \]
Thus, the electric field is:
- (a) \( 0 \, \text{N/C} \)
- (b) \( 0 \, \text{N/C} \)
- (c) \( 1.92 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{N/C} \]
Solution:
Given:
- Number of excess electrons \( n = 12 \)
- Charge of electron \( e = 1.60 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C} \)
- Electric field \( E = 2.5 \times 10^4 \, \text{N/C} \)
- Density of oil \( \rho = 1.26 \, \text{g/cm}^3 = 1.26 \times 10^3 \, \text{kg/m}^3 \)
- Gravitational acceleration \( g = 9.81 \, \text{m/s}^2 \)
For the drop to be stationary, the electric force balances the gravitational force:
\[ qE = mg \]
Where \( q = ne = 12 \times 1.60 \times 10^{-19} = 1.92 \times 10^{-18} \, \text{C} \).
Mass \( m \) of the drop:
\[ m = \frac{qE}{g} = \frac{(1.92 \times 10^{-18}) \cdot (2.5 \times 10^4)}{9.81} \approx 4.89 \times 10^{-15} \, \text{kg} \]
The mass of a spherical drop is \( m = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 \rho \). Rearranging for radius \( r \):
\[ r^3 = \frac{m}{\frac{4}{3} \pi \rho} \]
\[ r^3 = \frac{4.89 \times 10^{-15}}{\frac{4}{3} \cdot 3.1416 \cdot 1.26 \times 10^3} \approx \frac{4.89 \times 10^{-15}}{5.276 \times 10^3} \approx 9.27 \times 10^{-19} \]
\[ r = (9.27 \times 10^{-19})^{1/3} \approx 9.76 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{m} \]
Thus, the radius of the drop is approximately \( 0.976 \, \mu\text{m} \).
Solution:
Electrostatic field lines follow specific rules:
- They originate from positive charges and terminate at negative charges or infinity.
- They never intersect.
- They are smooth curves and do not form closed loops in a static field.
Without seeing Fig. 1.35, we can infer that any curve that:
- Intersects another field line is invalid (violates non-intersection rule).
- Forms a closed loop is invalid (electrostatic fields are conservative).
- Does not originate or terminate correctly (e.g., starting or ending in empty space) is invalid.
Thus, any curve in Fig. 1.35 that violates these rules cannot represent electrostatic field lines. (Refer to the specific figure for exact identification.)
Solution:
Given:
- Electric field gradient \( \frac{dE}{dz} = 10^5 \, \text{N/C·m} \)
- Dipole moment \( \vec{p} = -10^{-7} \, \text{C·m} \) (in negative z-direction)
(a) Force:
The force on an electric dipole in a non-uniform electric field is given by:
\[ \vec{F} = (\vec{p} \cdot \nabla) \vec{E} \]
Since \( \vec{p} = -10^{-7} \hat{k} \) and \( \vec{E} = E(z) \hat{k} \), with \( \frac{dE}{dz} = 10^5 \, \text{N/C·m} \):
\[ \vec{F} = p_z \cdot \frac{dE}{dz} \hat{k} = (-10^{-7}) \cdot 10^5 \hat{k} = -10^{-2} \hat{k} \, \text{N} \]
Thus, the force is \( -0.01 \, \text{N} \) in the negative z-direction.
(b) Torque:
Torque on a dipole is given by \( \vec{\tau} = \vec{p} \times \vec{E} \).
Since \( \vec{p} \) and \( \vec{E} \) are both along the z-direction (parallel or anti-parallel), their cross product is zero:
\[ \vec{\tau} = 0 \]
Thus, the torque is zero.
Solution:
(a)
For a conductor with a cavity and total charge \( Q \), the electric field inside the conductor (in the material) must be zero. Consider a Gaussian surface inside the conductor but outside the cavity. Since \( E = 0 \) inside the conductor, the flux through the Gaussian surface is zero. By Gauss’s law, the charge enclosed by this surface must be zero. Thus, no charge resides on the inner surface of the cavity. The entire charge \( Q \) must reside on the outer surface of the conductor.
(b)
When a conductor B with charge \( q \) is placed inside the cavity, insulated from A, the charge on B induces an equal and opposite charge \( -q \) on the inner surface of the cavity (to ensure \( E = 0 \) inside conductor A). The total charge on conductor A is \( Q \). Since the inner surface of the cavity has charge \( -q \), the remaining charge on A must be on its outer surface:
\[ Q_{\text{outer}} = Q - (-q) = Q + q \]
Thus, the charge on the outer surface of A is \( Q + q \).
(c)
To shield a sensitive instrument from external electrostatic fields, place it inside a hollow conductor (Faraday cage). The electric field inside a conductor is zero, so external fields cannot penetrate, protecting the instrument.
Solution:
Consider the hole as a combination of a positively charged conductor with surface charge density \( \sigma \) and a negatively charged patch (with \( -\sigma \)) to represent the absence of charge in the hole. The electric field just outside a conductor is \( \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \hat{n} \). Inside the conductor, the field is zero.
The field at the hole is the superposition of:
- Field due to the charged conductor (without hole): \( \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \hat{n} \) (outward).
- Field due to the negatively charged patch (\( -\sigma \)): This is equivalent to a flat sheet with field \( \frac{-\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \) (outward from the hole) on the outside and \( \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \) (inward) on the inside.
At the hole (treated as just outside), the total field is:
\[ E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} + \left( -\frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \right) = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \hat{n} \]
Thus, the electric field in the hole is \( \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \hat{n} \).
Solution:
Consider an infinite wire along the z-axis with uniform linear charge density \( \lambda \). We need to find the electric field at a point \( (r, 0, 0) \), at a perpendicular distance \( r \) from the wire.
Take a small segment of the wire at position \( (0, 0, z) \) with length \( dz \). The charge on this segment is \( dq = \lambda dz \). The distance from this segment to the point \( (r, 0, 0) \) is \( \sqrt{r^2 + z^2} \).
The electric field \( d\vec{E} \) due to \( dq \) at \( (r, 0, 0) \) using Coulomb’s law is:
\[ d\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{dq}{(r^2 + z^2)} \hat{r} \]
The position vector from \( (0, 0, z) \) to \( (r, 0, 0) \) is \( (r, 0, -z) \), so the unit vector is:
\[ \hat{r} = \frac{(r, 0, -z)}{\sqrt{r^2 + z^2}} \]
\[ d\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\lambda dz}{(r^2 + z^2)} \cdot \frac{(r, 0, -z)}{\sqrt{r^2 + z^2}} = \frac{\lambda dz}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (r^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} (r, 0, -z) \]
The x-component of the field is:
\[ dE_x = \frac{\lambda r dz}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (r^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} \]
The y- and z-components cancel out due to symmetry when integrating over the infinite wire (from \( z = -\infty \) to \( \infty \)). Integrate the x-component:
\[ E_x = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\lambda r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (r^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} dz \]
Let \( z = r \tan \theta \), so \( dz = r \sec^2 \theta d\theta \), and \( r^2 + z^2 = r^2 (1 + \tan^2 \theta) = r^2 \sec^2 \theta \).
\[ E_x = \frac{\lambda r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{r \sec^2 \theta}{(r^2 \sec^2 \theta)^{3/2}} d\theta = \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \cos \theta d\theta \]
\[ = \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} [\sin \theta]_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} = \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} (1 - (-1)) = \frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 r} \]
Thus, the electric field is:
\[ \vec{E} = \frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 r} \hat{r} \]
Solution:
Given:
- Charge of up quark (u): \( +\frac{2}{3}e \)
- Charge of down quark (d): \( -\frac{1}{3}e \)
- Proton charge: \( +e \)
- Neutron charge: \( 0 \)
- Each proton and neutron consists of three quarks.
For proton:
Let the proton have \( x \) up quarks and \( y \) down quarks, so \( x + y = 3 \). The total charge is:
\[ x \cdot \frac{2}{3}e + y \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{3}e\right) = e \]
\[ \frac{2x - y}{3}e = e \]
\[ 2x - y = 3 \]
Since \( x + y = 3 \), substitute \( y = 3 - x \):
\[ 2x - (3 - x) = 3 \]
\[ 2x - 3 + x = 3 \]
\[ 3x = 6 \implies x = 2 \]
\[ y = 3 - 2 = 1 \]
Thus, proton composition: 2 up quarks, 1 down quark (\( uud \)).
Check: \( 2 \cdot \frac{2}{3}e + 1 \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{3}e\right) = \frac{4}{3}e - \frac{1}{3}e = e \).
For neutron:
Let the neutron have \( x \) up quarks and \( y \) down quarks, so \( x + y = 3 \). The total charge is:
\[ x \cdot \frac{2}{3}e + y \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{3}e\right) = 0 \]
\[ \frac{2x - y}{3}e = 0 \]
\[ 2x - y = 0 \]
Since \( x + y = 3 \), substitute \( y = 3 - x \):
\[ 2x - (3 - x) = 0 \]
\[ 2x - 3 + x = 0 \]
\[ 3x = 3 \implies x = 1 \]
\[ y = 3 - 1 = 2 \]
Thus, neutron composition: 1 up quark, 2 down quarks (\( udd \)).
Check: \( 1 \cdot \frac{2}{3}e + 2 \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{3}e\right) = \frac{2}{3}e - \frac{2}{3}e = 0 \).
Thus, the quark composition is:
- Proton: \( uud \)
- Neutron: \( udd \)
Solution:
(a) General case:
For a test charge \( q \) at a null point (where \( \vec{E} = 0 \)), the force \( \vec{F} = q \vec{E} = 0 \), so it is in equilibrium. To check stability, consider the potential \( V \). In a region where \( \vec{E} = 0 \), the electric field is the negative gradient of the potential: \( \vec{E} = -\nabla V \). For \( \vec{E} = 0 \), the potential must be at an extremum or saddle point.
In electrostatics, the potential \( V \) satisfies Laplace’s equation in free space (no charges): \( \nabla^2 V = 0 \). This means \( V \) cannot have a local minimum or maximum in free space, as a minimum would require \( \nabla^2 V > 0 \), and a maximum would require \( \nabla^2 V < 0 \), both contradicting \( \nabla^2 V = 0 \). Thus, the null point must be a saddle point, where the potential increases in some directions and decreases in others. If the test charge is displaced slightly, it will experience a force in the direction of decreasing potential, moving it further from the null point. Hence, the equilibrium is unstable.
(b) Two charges:
Consider two charges: \( +Q \) at \( x = -a \) and \( -Q \) at \( x = a \). The electric field at a point \( x \) on the x-axis is:
\[ E_x = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (x + a)^2} - \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (x - a)^2} \]
At the null point (say, at \( x = 0 \)):
\[ \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 a^2} - \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 a^2} = 0 \]
So, \( \vec{E} = 0 \) at \( x = 0 \). To check stability, consider the potential or field near \( x = 0 \). The field for small \( x \):
\[ E_x \approx \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac{1}{(a + x)^2} - \frac{1}{(a - x)^2} \right] \]
Using approximation \( (a + x)^{-2} \approx a^{-2} (1 - 2x/a) \), and similarly for the other term:
\[ E_x \approx \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 a^2} \left[ (1 - 2x/a) - (1 + 2x/a) \right] = -\frac{Q x}{\pi \epsilon_0 a^3} \]
For a positive test charge, the force is \( F_x = q E_x \propto -x \), indicating that a displacement in the positive \( x \)-direction produces a force in the negative direction, and vice versa, pushing the charge away from \( x = 0 \). Thus, the equilibrium is unstable.
Solution:
Given:
- Mass of particle: \( m \)
- Charge of particle: \( -q \)
- Initial velocity: \( \vec{v} = v_x \hat{i} \)
- Electric field between plates: \( \vec{E} = E \hat{j} \) (assuming upward direction)
- Length of plates: \( L \)
The particle experiences a force \( \vec{F} = (-q) \vec{E} = -q E \hat{j} \), so acceleration in the y-direction:
\[ a_y = \frac{F_y}{m} = -\frac{q E}{m} \]
The x-direction motion is unaffected (no force in x-direction), so the time to cross the plates (length \( L \)) is:
\[ t = \frac{L}{v_x} \]
In the y-direction, initial velocity \( v_y = 0 \). The vertical deflection \( y \) is given by the kinematic equation:
\[ y = v_{y0} t + \frac{1}{2} a_y t^2 \]
Since \( v_{y0} = 0 \):
\[ y = \frac{1}{2} \left(-\frac{q E}{m}\right) \left(\frac{L}{v_x}\right)^2 = -\frac{q E L^2}{2 m v_x^2} \]
The magnitude of the deflection (ignoring direction):
\[ |y| = \frac{q E L^2}{2 m v_x^2} \]
Thus, the vertical deflection at the far edge of the plates is \( \frac{q E L^2}{2 m v_x^2} \).
Solution:
From Question 1.12, the electric field is along the z-direction with magnitude increasing uniformly at \( 10^5 \, \text{N/C·m} \). However, for this question, we assume a uniform electric field (as implied by “uniform” in the context), say \( \vec{E} = E \hat{k} \).
Given:
- Cube side: \( 20 \, \text{cm} = 0.2 \, \text{m} \)
- Faces parallel to coordinate planes.
For a uniform electric field, the net flux through a closed surface (like a cube) is zero unless there is a charge inside, by Gauss’s law. Since no charge is enclosed in the cube:
\[ \Phi = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = 0 \]
Alternatively, calculate flux through each face:
- Top face (z = 0.2 m): \( \vec{E} = E \hat{k} \), \( d\vec{A} = dA \hat{k} \), flux = \( E \cdot (0.2)^2 = 0.04 E \).
- Bottom face (z = 0): \( d\vec{A} = -dA \hat{k} \), flux = \( E \cdot (-0.04) = -0.04 E \).
- Other faces (x- and y-faces): \( \vec{E} \perp d\vec{A} \), so flux = 0.
Total flux: \( 0.04 E + (-0.04 E) + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0 \).
Thus, the net flux through the cube is \( 0 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Net outward flux: \( \Phi = 8.0 \times 10^3 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
(a) Net charge inside the box:
Using Gauss’s law: \( \Phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \).
\[ q = \Phi \cdot \epsilon_0 = 8.0 \times 10^3 \cdot 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \approx 7.083 \times 10^{-8} \, \text{C} \]
Thus, the net charge inside the box is \( 7.083 \times 10^{-8} \, \text{C} \).
(b) Zero net flux:
If the net outward flux is zero, Gauss’s law implies the net charge inside is zero: \( q = 0 \). However, this does not mean there are no charges inside the box. There could be equal amounts of positive and negative charges, canceling each other’s contribution to the net flux. For example, a dipole or multiple charges with zero total charge would produce zero net flux. Thus, you cannot conclude there are no charges inside the box.
Solution:
Given:
- Charge: \( q = +10 \, \mu\text{C} = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Distance above square: \( 5 \, \text{cm} = 0.05 \, \text{m} \)
- Square side: \( 10 \, \text{cm} = 0.1 \, \text{m} \)
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
Imagine the square as one face of a cube with edge 10 cm, and the charge at 5 cm above the center of the top face (inside the cube, at the cube’s center). The total flux through the cube, by Gauss’s law, is:
\[ \Phi_{\text{total}} = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{10 \times 10^{-6}}{8.854 \times 10^{-12}} \approx 1.129 \times 10^6 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Since the charge is at the center of the cube, the flux is equally distributed over the six faces of the cube. The flux through one face (the square) is:
\[ \Phi_{\text{square}} = \frac{\Phi_{\text{total}}}{6} = \frac{1.129 \times 10^6}{6} \approx 1.882 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Thus, the magnitude of the electric flux through the square is \( 1.882 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charge: \( q = 2.0 \, \mu\text{C} = 2.0 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
Using Gauss’s law, the net electric flux through a closed surface is:
\[ \Phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \]
Substituting the values:
\[ \Phi = \frac{2.0 \times 10^{-6}}{8.854 \times 10^{-12}} \approx 2.26 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Thus, the net electric flux through the surface is \( 2.26 \times 10^5 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charge: \( +Q \) at the origin
- Sphere of radius \( R \), flux through upper hemisphere
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 \)
By Gauss’s law, the total flux through the entire spherical surface is:
\[ \Phi_{\text{total}} = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0} \]
The sphere is symmetric, and the charge is at the center. The upper hemisphere (z ≥ 0) covers half the solid angle of the sphere. Since the electric field is radial and uniform over the sphere’s surface, the flux is evenly distributed over the surface area. The surface area of the sphere is \( 4 \pi R^2 \), and the upper hemisphere has half the surface area:
\[ \Phi_{\text{upper}} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \Phi_{\text{total}} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{2 \epsilon_0} \]
Thus, the electric flux through the upper hemisphere is \( \frac{Q}{2 \epsilon_0} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charge: \( q \) at the center of a cube
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 \)
By Gauss’s law, the total electric flux through the entire cube (a closed surface) is:
\[ \Phi_{\text{total}} = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0} \]
Since the charge is at the center of the cube, symmetry ensures the flux is equally distributed over the six faces of the cube. Thus, the flux through one face is:
\[ \Phi_{\text{face}} = \frac{\Phi_{\text{total}}}{6} = \frac{q}{6 \epsilon_0} \]
Thus, the electric flux through any one face of the cube is \( \frac{q}{6 \epsilon_0} \).
Solution:
Given:
- Charges: \( q_1 = +9 \, \mu\text{C} = 9 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \), \( q_2 = +1 \, \mu\text{C} = 1 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \)
- Permittivity of free space: \( \epsilon_0 = 8.854 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2 \)
By Gauss’s law, the net electric flux through a closed surface is:
\[ \Phi = \frac{q_{\text{total}}}{\epsilon_0} \]
Total charge: \( q_{\text{total}} = q_1 + q_2 = 9 \times 10^{-6} + 1 \times 10^{-6} = 10 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{C} \).
\[ \Phi = \frac{10 \times 10^{-6}}{8.854 \times 10^{-12}} \approx 1.129 \times 10^6 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \]
Thus, the net electric flux through the surface is \( 1.129 \times 10^6 \, \text{N·m}^2/\text{C} \).